Trade Secrets as Important Data IP: A Comparative Study of Legal Risk in Sino-US Data Transfers

Authors

  • Aamir Akhtar LLM Scholar, School of IP Law, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China
  • Li Lingfeng ZUEL-SUR, School of Law and Economics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China
  • Umar Farooq Advocate, District Bar Association Lahore, Pakistan

Keywords:

Trade Secrets, Important Data, Cybersecurity Law, Data Localization Policies, Data Security Regulation, Confidential Business Information

Abstract

The rapid digitalization of global commerce has intensified legal conflicts over the control and transfer of intellectual property (IP)-related data. This article examines the irreconcilable tension between China’s Data Security Law (DSL) and Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) and the extraterritorial reach of the US CLOUD Act. It argues that China’s data sovereignty framework classifies commercially sensitive information such as source code, AI training data, and R&D outputs as “Important Data,” subject to stringent security assessments and strict controls on cross-border transfers. In particular, Article 36 of the DSL functions as a blocking provision, prohibiting disclosure of domestically stored data to foreign authorities without state authorization. Conversely, the US CLOUD Act empowers law enforcement agencies to compel US-based service providers to produce data regardless of its physical location, effectively extending US jurisdiction beyond national borders. This creates a legal paradox in which compliance with one regime results in violation of the other. The article demonstrates that this regulatory conflict generates significant legal uncertainty and operational risk for multinational corporations. It concludes that, in the absence of harmonized global standards, data localization and geofencing remain the most viable short-term compliance strategies.

References

Bonardi, G. (2023). Outbound data transfer from China: Implications for national security and foreign businesses. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press.

Bygrave, L. A. (2020). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A commentary. Oxford University Press.

Căpușneanu, S., et al. (2025). Reshaping the digital economy with big data: A meta-analysis of trends and technological evolution. Electronics, 14(2709).

Chen, X., Zhang, L., & Cheng, X. (2024). Fiscal decentralization and the development of the digital economy: Evidence from China. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 27(3), 276–294.

Colangelo, G. (2025). The privacy/antitrust curse: Insights from GDPR application in competition law proceedings. Antitrust Bulletin, 70(1), 113–132.

Daskal, J. (2018). Privacy and security across borders. Yale Law Journal Forum, 128, 1029–1049.

Dzigal, N., et al. (2025). Digital sovereignty and geopolitics in the field of data protection: A comparison of the EU, China, and the USA [Unpublished manuscript].

Erie, M. S., & Streinz, T. (2021). The Beijing effect: China's Digital Silk Road as transnational data governance. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 54(1), 1–92.

European Commission. (2022). The Digital Markets Act: Ensuring fair and open digital markets.

Galbraith, J. (2018). Congress enacts the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act, reshaping US law governing cross-border access to data. American Journal of International Law, 112(3), 487–492.

Giladi Shtub, T., & Gal, M. S. (2022). The competitive effects of China’s legal data regime. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 18(4), 936–968.

Hongqiang, Z., et al. (2025). Data compliance in cross-border e-commerce: A comparative study of China and Malaysia's regulatory frameworks. Global Academic Frontiers, 3, 65–78.

Hug, F. (2024). Rules governing state-owned enterprises: Competition, coordination, and control. In China’s Free Trade Agreement Strategies (pp. 139–165). Springer.

Khan, J., & Belk, R. (2024). Case study two: China's e-CNY or digital RMB. In Digital Currency and Consumption (pp. 261–280).

Li, Q. (2025). Excessive data collection and (mis) use of data: A comparative law and economics study on the Chinese Didi case and the German Facebook case. Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 13, Article cxae018.

Li, W. C. Y., Nirei, M., & Yamana, K. (2019). Value of data: There's no such thing as a free lunch in the digital economy. Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).

Li, Z., et al. (2025). Impact of the General Data Protection Regulation on the global mobile app market: Digital trade implications of data protection and privacy regulations. Information Systems Research, 36, 669–685.

Lin, X. (2025). A model of big data-based governance: China’s national government big data platform and an analysis of its governance competence. Chinese Political Science Review, 1–22.

Mulligan, S. P. (2018). Cross-border data sharing under the CLOUD Act (CRS Report No. LSB10135). Congressional Research Service.

Nettesheim, M. (2023). Data protection in contractual relationships (Art. 6 (1)(b) GDPR). SSRN Electronic Journal.

Roccon, M. (2023). Foreign investment in China’s cloud industry: A case study of Microsoft Azure’s expansion [Unpublished manuscript].

Rughiniș, R., et al. (2021). From social netizens to data citizens: Variations of GDPR awareness in 28 European countries. Computer Law & Security Review, 42, 105585.

Schwartz, P. M. (2018). Legal access to the global cloud. Columbia Law Review, 118(6), 1681–1762.

Seuwou, P. (2025). Digital business: Navigating the digital landscape and thriving in the digital economy.

Shao, D., et al. (2025). Comparative analysis of data protection regulations in East African countries. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 27, 486–505.

Shen, Y., & Zhang, B. (2025). Advancing the emergency industry: Policy, innovation, and implications for national security. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16, 6907–6925.

Shi, Y., & Wei, F. (2025). Comparative analysis of digital economy-driven innovation development in China: An international perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16, 4422–4445.

Shukla, S., et al. (2023). Data economy in the digital age.

Shurson, J. (2023). Rethinking comity: Resolving conflicts in transnational digital investigations [Doctoral dissertation, Queen Mary University of London].

Sitompul, J. (2020). Cross-border access to electronic evidence: Improving Indonesian law and practice in investigating cybercrime.

Streinz, T. (2021). The evolution of European data law. In P. Craig & G. de Búrca (Eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (3rd ed., pp. 902–936). Oxford University Press.

Suntsova, O. (2024). Digital transformation of the global economy: Challenges and opportunities. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Vandendriessche, R., & Buts, C. (2025). Separating or integrating? Data protection in competition assessments: A systematic literature review. European Competition Journal, 1–30.

Voss, W. G., & Pernot-Leplay, E. (2024). China data flows and power in the era of Chinese big tech. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, 44(1), 1–55.

Wang, C. C., Liu, U., & Dong, H. H. (2025). The United States’ strengthened national security review of Chinese investment: Implications from the tech war. American University International Law Review, 40, 1151–1180.

Wang, X., & Huang, Y. (2022). China’s antimonopoly law enforcement in the digital economy. Antitrust Bulletin, 67(4), 562–578.

Xu, W., & Kievich, A. V. (2024). The main trends in the digital economy and finance that shape the current landscape and vector of development of industries. Economy & Banks, 42–55.

Yu, Y. (2023). The interaction between competition (law) and data protection (law) for privacy protection in digital markets [Unpublished manuscript].

Yun, H. (2025). China’s data sovereignty and security: Implications for global digital borders and governance. Chinese Political Science Review, 10, 178–199.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Akhtar, A., Li Lingfeng, & Farooq, U. (2026). Trade Secrets as Important Data IP: A Comparative Study of Legal Risk in Sino-US Data Transfers. Sarhad Journal of Legal Studies, 2(01), 32–41. Retrieved from https://journal.suit.edu.pk/index.php/sjls/article/view/1184