Sadia Shaikh, Muhammad Faisal Sultan, Waqar Akbar, Tasleem Arif


Corporate Entrepreneurship (CE) is not a new strategy of fostering a firm’s performance and to increase customer satisfaction and market share, espoused by striving firms. However, studies on the effect of CE on the performance of GLCs are not common in literature, especially in the eastern world. The literature strongly indicates the requirement of more workable models of CE for GLCs in Pakistan, due to dearth in existing studies on the subject. Hence, the aim of this study is to gauge the impact of the most compelling element of CE on the operational performance of GLCs. This study has also been supplemented with the moderating role of incentive schemes in order to effectively gauge the motivational aspect in CE of GLCs. The analysis has been made through SMART PLS and structural equational modelling was used as the tool of analysis. Analysis indicated that innovation is perceived as one of the prime tools that may affect operational performance, although GLCs have different compensation structures and thus does not seem to be affecting the relationship of innovativeness and operational performance of GLCs.


Corporate Entrepreneurship, Public Sector, Innovativeness, Operational Performance

Full Text:



Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017, September). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 890, No. 1, p. 012163). IOP Publishing.

Abou-Moghli, A. A., & Al-Abdallah, G. (2018). Evaluating the association between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22(4), 1-10.

Adeoti, J. O., & Asabi, M. O. (2018). Analysis of Dimensions of Corporate Entrepreneurship and Organizational Performance in Nigeria. Amity Journal of Entrepreneurship, 3(2),1-11.

Afthanorhan, W. M. A. B. W. (2014). Hierarchical component using reflective-formative measurement model in partial least square structural equation modeling (Pls-Sem). International Journal of Mathematics, 2(2), 33-49.

Al‐Jinini, D. K., Dahiyat, S. E., & Bontis, N. (2019). Intellectual capital, entrepreneurial orientation, and technical innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises. Knowledge and Process Management, 26(2), 69-85.

Ambad, S. N. A., & Wahab, K. A. (2016). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: evidence from Malaysian large companies. International Journal of Business and Society, 17(2), 259-280.

Ashraf, J. (2017). Examining the public sector recruitment and selection, in relation to job analysis in Pakistan. Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1309134.

Barros, H. M., & Lazzarini, S. G. (2012). Do organizational incentives spur innovation? BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 9(3), 308-328.

Barshay, S.A., Karp, B.S. McLoughlin, J. M. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Performance-Based Compensation Programs. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.

Beaver, G. (2003). Small firms: owners and entrepreneurs. Strategic Change, 12(4), 177.

Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 103168.

Bierwerth, M., Schwens, C., Isidor, R., & Kabst, R. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship and performance: A meta-analysis. Small business economics, 45(2), 255-278.

Burgess, S., & Ratto, M. (2003). The role of incentives in the public sector: Issues and evidence. Oxford review of economic policy, 19(2), 285-300.

Canh, N. T., Liem, N. T., Thu, P. A., & Khuong, N. V. (2019). The Impact of Innovation on the Firm Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility of Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms. Sustainability, 11(13), 3666.

Carter, S., & Jones-Evans, D. (Eds.). (2006). Enterprise and small business: Principles, practice, and policy. Pearson Education.

Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2010). A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks. Decision support systems, 49(1), 24-30.

Entebang, H., & Harrison, R. T. (2019). Corporate Entrepreneurship Performance: Findings from Government-Linked Companies in Malaysia. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 9(4), 248-264.

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2004). New lists: Fundamentals and survival rates. Journal of financial Economics, 73(2), 229-269

George, G., Kotha, R., Parikh, P., Alnuaimi, T., & Bahaj, A. S. (2016). Social structure, reasonable gain, and entrepreneurship in Africa. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1118-1131.

Goodale, J. C., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Covin, J. G. (2011). Operations management and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating effect of operations control on the antecedents of corporate entrepreneurial activity in relation to innovation performance. Journal of operations management, 29(1-2), 116-127.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results, and higher acceptance. Long range planning, 46(1-2), 1-12.

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), 414-433.

He, Q., Wang, M., & Martínez-Fuentes, C. Impact of corporate entrepreneurial strategy on firm performance in China. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1-18.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Ikenna, E., Julius, T. & Ngozi Ursula, E. (2017). Effects of Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Performance of Selected Banks in Nigeria, International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research. 2(4), 3068-3092

Incekara, A., & Savrul, M. (2013). Impact of globalization on entrepreneurship in developing countries. In International conference on Eurasian economies.

Johl, S. K., Bruce, A., & Binks, M. (2013). Remuneration structure and corporate entrepreneurship: A UK study. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(7), 116-126.

Karacaoglu, K., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & San, F. B. (2013). The impact of corporate entrepreneurship on firms' financial performance: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange Firms. International Business Research, 6(1), 163-175.

Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261.

Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Covin, J. G. (2014). Diagnosing a firm's internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57(1), 37-47.

Miller, D., & Le Breton–Miller, I. (2011). Governance, social identity, and entrepreneurial orientation in closely held public companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 35(5), 1051-1076.

Minafam, Z. (2017). Corporate Entrepreneurship and innovation performance of established ventures: case of Iranian vanguard companies. Economic analysis, (1), 62-76.

Moghaddam, J. Y., Khorakian, A., & Maharati, Y. (2015). Organizational Entrepreneurship and its Impact on the Performance of Governmental Organizations in the City of Mashhad. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169(20), 75-87.

Nayyar, J. (2017). How Corporate Entrepreneurship Can Enhance Organizational Performance in Public Universities of Pakistan? International Journal of Science and Research, 6(2), 2038-2050.

Nayyar, J., & Mahmood, R. (2014). The effect of corporate entrepreneurship determinants on performance of public higher education institutions in Pakistan. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(1), 19-31.

Peters, T. J., & Waterman Jr, R. H. (1982). In Search of. Of Excellence, New York: Harper and Row.

Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring. Productivity & Management Review, 16(2), 141-152.

Quinn, J. B. (1985). Managing innovation: controlled chaos. Harvard Business Review, 53, 73-84.

Rehman, S. (2009). A Study of Public Sector Organizations with Respect to Recruitment, Job Satisfaction and Retention. Global Business & Management Research, 4(1), 76-88.

Sijtsma, K. (2009a). Over misverstanden rond Cronbachs alfa en de wenselijkheid van alternatieven. Psycholoog, 44(11), 561.

Sijtsma, K. (2009b). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107.

Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., & Bristow, A. (2015). Understanding research philosophies and approaches: Research methods for business students.

Umrani, W. A., Kura, K. M., & Ahmed, U. (2018). Corporate entrepreneurship and business performance. PSU Research Review, 2(1), 59-80.

Wagner, E. R., & Hansen, E. N. (2005). Innovation in large versus small companies: insights from the US wood products industry. Management Decision, 43(6), 837-850.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Sarhad Journal of Management Sciences by Sarhad University of Science & Information Technology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at