IS PRIVATIZATION A PANACEA? PRE AND POST PRIVATIZATION ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

Authors

  • Muhammad Zeb Khan Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
  • Zia Ullah Professor, LEEDS University, Lahore

Keywords:

privatization, financial performance, employee & customer satisfaction

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the impact of privatization of state-owned enterprise on financial performance, employees’ satisfaction and customer satisfaction.  Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) was taken as the organization for analysis. Five years pre and post-privatization financial figures were analyzed to compare the return on asset, return on equity, earning per share, net profit margin, and dividend payout. To know customer satisfaction level, the questionnaire was personally administered and 102 questionnaires complete from all respects were included for analysis. A semi-structured interview was conducted with 25 employees to determine the satisfaction level of employees. Findings of the study confirmed adverse financial performance after privatization followed by the high level of employees’ dissatisfaction. However, customer satisfaction level was high after privatization

Author Biography

Muhammad Zeb Khan, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration

References

Al-Jazzaf, M. I. (1999). Impact of privatization on airlines performance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 5(1), 45-52.

Blanchard, O. J., Dornbusch, R., Krugman, P. R., Layard, R., & Summers, L. H. (1991). Reforms in Eastern Europe. Cambridge, MA, itd: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Bortolotti, B., D’Souza, J., Fantini, M., & Megginson, W. L. (2002). Privatization and the sources of performance improvement in the global telecommunications industry. Telecommunications Policy, 26(5), 243-268

Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., & Guedhami, O. (2005). Post-privatization corporate governance: The role of ownership structure and investor protection. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 369-399.

Clarke, J. (2005). New Labour’s citizens: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned? Critical social policy, 25(4), 447-463.

Cook, P., & Kirkpatrick, C. (1998). Privatization, employment and social protection in developing countries. Privatization, Entrepreneurship and Economic Reform. London: Edward Elgar.

Estrin, S., Hanousek, J., KoÄenda, E., & Svejnar, J. (2009). The effects of privatization and ownership in transition economies. Journal of Economic Literature, 699-728.

Fischer, R., Gutiérrez, R., & Serra, P. (2002). The Effects of Privatization on Firms and on Social Welfare. Centro de Economía Aplicada, Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Facultad de Ciencias Fisicas y Matemáticas, Universidad de Chile.

Gupta, S., Ma, H., & Schiller, C. (1999). Privatization, social impact, and social safety nets. International Monetary Fund.

Harper, J. T. (2002). The performance of privatized firms in the Czech Republic. Journal of Banking & Finance, 26(4), 621-649.

Savas, E. S., & Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships (p. 31). New York: Chatham House.

Sachs, J., & Lipton, D. (1990). Poland's economic reform. Foreign Affairs, 47-66.

Torero, M. (2005). Privatization in Peru. Privatization in Latin America: Myths and Reality,89-120.

http://www.pta.gov.pk/annual-reports/annrep06.pdf retrieved on 12 December 2015

http://www.pta.gov.pk/annual-reports/annreport2012_1.pdf retrieved on 15 December 2015

http://privatisation.gov.pk/ retrieved on 1 December 2015

Downloads

Published

30.06.2018