A Study of the Key Roles of Teachers' Associations in Education System in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Authors

  • Niaz Muhammad Aajiz

Keywords:

Teachers' Associations, teachers Unity, association of teaching staff, education system

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the key roles of Teachers'
Associations in education system. The main objectives of the study were to ï¬nd out the basic functions of teachers' associations, to highlight the importance of teachers' associations, to evaluate the responsibilities of teachers' associations and to investigate the effectiveness of teachers' associations. All High Schools of District Swat in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan were the population of the study. Ten High Schools in urban area and 100 teachers were selected randomly as sample of the study. The data was collected through questionnaires. It was tabulated and result was shown in percentage, mean score and standard deviation. Findings of the study indicated that Teachers' Associations play very important roles in education system. They work for the protection of teachers' rights, keep them united, solve their problems, help in raising funds for the betterment of education and bring reforms in education system.

References

Ager, R. & Pyle, K. (2013). NFER Teacher Voice Omnibus. November, 2012. Survey Understanding union membership and activity. Department of Education.

Beltran, M. A. (2012). Education International (E.I) Report. Worlds of Education. Advocating for a Strong Profession.

Dinardo, John, and Lemieux, T. (1997). “Diverging Male Wage Inequality in the United States and Canada: Do Institutions Explain the Difference?†Industrial and Labor Relations Review 50: 629–51.

Eberts, R. W. (2007). Teachers Unions and Student Performance: Help or Hindrance? The Future of Children (Journal).Volume 17.

Haas, F. F. (2010).Teacher Induction and Teachers' Unions: A Crossroads of Opportunity.

Han, E. S. (2012). The Impact of Teachers Unions on Teachers' Well-being under Different Legal Environments: Evidence from Districts and Teachers Matched Data.

Harman, G. (1984). Conceptual and Theoretical Issues. In Hough, JR (ed.) Education policy. New York: St Martin's.

Kingdon, G. and Muzammil, M. (2008). A Political Economy of Education in India: The Case of Uttar Pradesh. Published by Oxford Policy Institute.

Kleiner, M. M. and Petree, D. L. (1988). Unionism and Licensing of Public School Teachers: Impact on Wages and Educational Output.

Lovenheim, M. F. (2009). The Effect of Teachers' Unions on Education Production: Evidence from Union Election Certiï¬cations in Three Midwestern States, SIEPR, Stanford University.

Loyo, A. (2001). Working Group on Teachers, Unions and Educational Reforms in Latin America. Buenos Aires: FLACSO-PREAL. Available in Spanish at: www.preal.org/ GTSD/pdf/loyo.pdf.

Masenya, S. J. (2013). School based Unionism in a Gauteng School District. Department of Education Management and Policy Studies, Faculty of Education University of Pretoria.

Nelis, K. (2001). How Unions Beneï¬t Kids: New Research Dispels Myths about Unions. New York Teachers' Association.

Pansiri, N. O. (2013). An Analysis of Teachers' Status in Crisis of Public Service Reforms in Botswana. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 12, pp 233-244, March 2013.

Rosenfeld, N. S. (2010). United Federation of Teachers (UFT), 1960-2010. A Union of Professionals, 52 Broadway, New York, NY 10004 www.u.org

Rottmann, C. (2008). Organized Agents: Canadian Teacher Unions as Alternative Sitesfor Social Justice Activism. Canadian Journal of Education, 31(4): 975–1014.

Downloads

Published

2019-10-16