THE RELATIONSHIP STUDY BETWEEN COHESION AND PERFORMANCEOF PLAYERS OF HOCKEY, IN PAKISTAN

Saeed Javed, Abida Naseer, Abd Rahim, Muhammad Shariff, Muhammad Irfan Sheraz, Mukhtar Ahmad

Abstract


This paper represents the findings of a larger study which highlights the relationship between cohesion and the performance among hockey players of Pakistan in view of socio-interactional context. Pakistan won laurels in Field hockey with four World Cup and three Olympics titles to its credit but no effort has been made to find out the factors which have turned Pakistan (as a team) from the status of a giant into a pygmy during the last two decades. The foremost objective of this paper is to scrutinize the relationship between cohesion and players’ performance. A sample of 296 players from 14sport departments was chosen as respondents. Adopted questionnaire was used to collect the survey data. The findings highlighted the significant (p=.001) relationship between cohesion and players’ performance. It is concluded that the cohesiveness among players is to be developed and expanded regarding players’ performance to fulfil sport requirements. Recommendations have been made to raise the excellence, relevance, and legitimacy in team regarding cohesion with players’ performance.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alemu, S. M., &Babu, M. S. (2012). The relationship between coaches’ leadership styles, team cohesion and team success: the case of premier league soccer clubs in Ethiopia. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 1(11), 1-13.

Asghar, E. (2011). A comparative study of multidimensional talent in field hockey at development stage between the players of Germany and Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leipzig, Germany). Retrieved from http://library.gcu.edu.pk/Thesis/PhD/GCUFAC-18.pdf

Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.

Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., &Widmeyer, W. N. (1998).The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups.In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

Carron, A. V., Eys, M. A., & Burke, S. M. (2007b). Team cohesion: Nature, correlates, and development. In S. Jowett & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 91-101). Champaign, USA: Human Kinetics.

Carron, A. V., Hausenblas, H. A., &Eys, M. A. (2005). Group dynamics in sport (3rd ed.). Morgantown, WV. Fitness Information Technology.

Carron, A. V., Shapcott, K. M., & Burke, S. M. (2007a).Group cohesion in sport and exercise: Past, present and future. In M. R. Beauchamp, & M. A. Eys (Eds.), Group dynamics in exercise and sport psychology: Contemporary themes (pp. 117-139). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.

Chang, A., Duck, J., & Bordia, P. (2006).Understanding the multidimensionality of group development.Small Group Research, 37(4), 327-350.

Chelladurai, P., &Saleh, S. D. (1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 34-45

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design (International Student Edition) Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4thed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dobrescu, T. (2014). The role of non-verbal communication in the coach-athlete relationship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 286–291.

Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Visscher, C., Lemmink, K. A. P. M., &Mulder, T. W. (2004).Relation between multidimensional performance characteristics and level of performance in talented youth field hockey players.Journal of sports sciences, 22, 1053–1063. doi:10.1080/02640410410001729991

Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Visscher, C., Lemmink, K. A. P. M., & Mulder, T. (2007). Multidimensional performance characteristics and standard of performance in talented youth field hockey players: a longitudinal study. Journal of sports sciences, 25(4), 481–899. doi:10.1080/02640410600719945

Eys, M., Ohlert, J., Evans, M. B., Wolf, S. A., Martin, L. J., Bussel, M V., & Steins, C. (2015). Cohesion and performance for female and male sport teams.The Sport Psychologist,29, 97 -109.

Home, T., & Carron,A. V. (1985) “Compatibility in coach-athlete relationship. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 137-149.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012).Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mix approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Kanchan, Singh, R., &Tarandeep.(2012). Relationship between team cohesion and performance in ball games.VSRD Technical & Non-Technical Journal 3(5), 191–196.

Landers, D. M., &Luschen, G. (1974).Team performance outcome and cohesiveness of competitive coacting groups.International Review of Sport Sociology, 9, 57-69.

MohdZainal, M. H., &Rosli, M. (2012).The relationship between group cohesiveness and performance: An empirical study of cooperatives movement in Malaysia. International Journal of Cooperative Studies, 1(1), 15-20.

Murray, N. P. (2006). The differential effect of team cohesion and leadership behavior in high school sports.Individual Differences Research, 4(4), 216–225.

Onag, Z., &Tepeci, M. (2014). Team effectiveness in sport teams: The effects of team cohesion, intra team communication and team norms on team member satisfaction and intent to remain.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 420 – 428.

Singh, K. (2007). “Quantitative social research methods”, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

Stewart, C., &Owens, L. (2011). Behavioral characteristics of favorite Coaches: Implications for Coach Education. The Physical Educator, 68(2), 90-97.

VanVoorhis, C. R. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43-50.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




ISSN 2520-7814