The Current Extent and Mode of Interconnection among Innovation Laboratories: An Empirical Study

Authors

  • Atia Bano Memon University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  • Kyrill Meyer Institute for Digital Technologies, Leipzig, Germany

Keywords:

Innovation Laboratories, inter-organizational collaboration, Inter-InnoLab collaboration, Open innovation, Innovation platforms, Interconnection

Abstract

This paper relates to the assessment of inter-InnoLab collaboration. A qualitative approach in the form of semi-structured expert interviews with a sample of 21 Innovation Laboratory facilitators selected through purposive sampling technique is used to investigate the current extent and mode of interconnection among existing Innovation Laboratories. The findings reveal that the current state of inter-InnoLab collaboration is sparse whereby only few existing InnoLabs exercise exchanging information with others in sporadic physical meetings. The main barriers hindering the inter-InnoLab collaboration are identified as business competition, inadequate information about others’ existence and competencies, and fractional understanding of other types of innovation support. It has been further found that the InnoLabs leverage physical meetings and usual web-based communication tools as primary means for connecting with each other and there is no any particular tool for supporting the inter-InnoLab collaboration process in a dedicated and domain-specific manner.

Author Biographies

Atia Bano Memon, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Assistant Professor at the Department of Computer Science, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan

Kyrill Meyer, Institute for Digital Technologies, Leipzig, Germany

Senior researcher at the Institute for Digital Technologies, Leipzig, Germany

References

Coombes, L., Allen, D., Humphrey, D. and Neale, J. (2009), “In-depth interviewsâ€, Research methods for health and social care, pp. 197–210.

Faems, D., van Looy, B. and Debackere, K. (2005), “Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach*â€, Journal of product innovation management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 238–250.

Gey, R., Meyer, L.P. and Thieme, M. (2013), “A Conceptual Framework for Describing the Phenomenon Innovation Laboratory: A Structurational Viewpoint†In Proceedings of the XXIII International RESER Conference, Aix en Provence, France, pp. 19–21.

Goes, J.B. and Park, S.H. (1997), “Interorganizational links and innovation: The case of hospital servicesâ€, Academy of management journal, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 673–696.

Hagedoorn, J. (1993), “Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differencesâ€, Strategic management journal, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 371–385.

Hagedoorn, J. (2002), “Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960â€, Research policy, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 477–492.

Hamel, G. (1991), “Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliancesâ€, Strategic management journal, Vol. 12 No. S1, pp. 83–103.

Knox, S. and Burkard, A.W. (2009), “Qualitative research interviewsâ€, Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 19 No. 4-5, pp. 566–575.

Magadley, W. and Birdi, K. (2009), “Innovation labs: an examination into the use of physical spaces to enhance organizational creativityâ€, Creativity and innovation management, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 315–325.

Memon, A.B. and Meyer, K. (2017), “Towards the Functional Roles of an Innovation Laboratory as a Platform for Innovation. An Observational Approachâ€, International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 32–49.

Memon, A.B., Meyer, K., Thieme, M. and Meyer, L.-P. (2018), “Inter-InnoLab collaboration. An investigation of the diversity and interconnection among Innovation Laboratoriesâ€, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 47, pp. 1–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.11.003.

Memon, A.B., Meyer, L.-P., Meyer, K. and Fähnrich, K.-P. (2014), “An Insight Survey of Innovation Laboratories Worldwideâ€, Advances in The Human Side of Service Engineering, Vol. 1, pp. 174–185.

Meyer, L.-P., Schultz, J., Foradi, M., Thieme, M. and Meyer, K. (2015), “Innovation Laboratories Worldwide. Insights gathered through the analysis of the representation in the World Wide Webâ€, Qucosa publication server. Available online at http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-157661.

Patton, M.Q. (1990), Qualitative evaluation and research methods, SAGE Publications, inc.

Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996), “Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnologyâ€, Administrative science quarterly, pp. 116–145.

Puttick, R. (2014), “Innovation Teams and Labs: A practice guideâ€, available at: http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/innovation-teams-and-labs-practice-guide (accessed 11 July 2016).

Schmidt, J. (2009), “Erarbeitung und Anwendung eines strukturierten Kriterienkatalogs zum Vergleich von Innovationslaborenâ€, Erarbeitung und Anwendung eines strukturierten Kriterienkatalogs zum Vergleich von Innovationslaboren.

Thieme, M. and Meyer, K. (2011), “Innovation through collaboration: a case-study based strategy to connect research institutions and enterprises†In Annual (SRII) Global Conference, SRII, pp. 622–629.

Willoughby, K. and Galvin, P. (2005), “Inter-organizational collaboration, knowledge intensity, and the sources of innovation in the bioscience-technology industriesâ€, Knowledge, Technology & Policy, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 56–73.

Downloads

Published

01.07.2020