CAPITAL STRUCTURE DETERMINANTS OF ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS OF PAKISTAN

Authors

  • Muhammad Yar COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus
  • Anam Javeed University of Wah WahCantt
  • Wajid Khan Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31529/sjms.2018.4.2.10

Abstract

Purpose- The major objective behind conducting this research is to explicate that how does the conventional as well as Islamic banks opt for their capital structures and what are the noteworthy variables that effect the decisions of the company as regard to their capital structure.

 

Design/methodology/approach- Data for study was gathered throughthe yearly reports of the KSE indexed companies. The yearly reports from the years 2004-2014 were selected for the study. For analysis, ordinary least square (OLS) is applied in order to obtain the results.

 

Findings- The primary outcomes of study prove that the conventional banks are more leveraged as compared to the Islamic banks. In addition, the conventional banks are bigger in size than Islamic banks and possess higher level of profitability. The fixed operating resources possessed by the Islamic banks are more in comparison to the conventional banks. The outcomes show that the profitability and tangibility are inversely associated with book leverage however the bank size has significant nexus with the book leverage of Islamic banks. On the other hand, profitability, growth and tangibility are negatively related to book leverage in whereas the bank size positivelyimpacts the decisions of the conventional banks for choosing the capital structure. Earning volatility shows no impact on capital structure decisions.

 

Practical implications- The outcomes of the study present that the directors of bank need to develop an understanding related to the bank specific factors which would help them to decide regarding the capital structure of the bank taking into consideration that the controlling powers are vested with state bank of Pakistan.

 

Originality/value- This study would propose that some noteworthy insights regarding the variables that impact financing decisions ofPakistani conventional and Islamic banks. This study also provides a framework to the future researchers for deeper exploration regarding capital structure of the banks.

 

 

Keywords- Conventional Banks; Islamic Banks, Ordinary Least Square, State bank of Pakistan

 

Author Biographies

Muhammad Yar, COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus

Assistant Professor COMSATS University Islamabad, Wah Campus WahCantt, Punjab, Pakistan

Wajid Khan, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology

Assistant Professor, Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology

References

Ahmed Sheikh, N., & Wang, Z. (2011). Determinants of capital structure: An empirical study of firms in manufacturing industry of Pakistan. Managerial Finance, 37(2), 117-133.

Amidu, M. (2007). Determinants of capital structure of banks in Ghana: an empirical approach. Baltic Journal of Management, 2(1), 67-79.

Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1994). Did risk-based capital allocate bank credit and cause a" credit crunch" in the United States? Journal of Money, credit and Banking, 26(3), 585-628.

Diamond, D. W., & Rajan, R. G. (2000). A theory of bank capital. The Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2431-2465.

Diamond, D. W., & Rajan, R. G. (2001). Banks, short-term debt and financial crises: theory, policy implications and applications. Paper presented at the Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy.

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2002). Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. The review of financial studies, 15(1), 1-33.

Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: which factors are reliably important? Financial management, 38(1), 1-37.

Gropp, R., & Heider, F. (2010). The determinants of bank capital structure. Review of finance, 14(4), 587-622.

Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 1251-1271.

Hellwig, M. (2014). Financial stability, monetary policy, banking supervision, and central banking.

Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329.

Karim, M. A., Hassan, M. K., Hassan, T., & Mohamad, S. (2014). Capital adequacy and lending and deposit behaviors of conventional and Islamic banks. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 28, 58-75.

Kuo, H.-C., & Chi-Haw, L. (2003). The determinants of the capital structure of commercial banks in Taiwan. International Journal of Management, 20(4), 515.

Miller, M. H., & Modigliani, F. (1963). Dividend policy and market valuation: a reply. The Journal of Business, 36(1), 116-119.

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American economic review, 48(3), 261-297.

Mohammed, H. K., & Mekonnen, Y. (2015). Factors affecting the financing policy of commercial banks in Ethiopia. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 4(2), 44-53.

Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of financial economics, 13(2), 187-221.

Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421-1460.

Sheikh, N. A., & Qureshi, M. A. (2017). Determinants of capital structure of Islamic and conventional commercial banks: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 10(1), 24-41.

Tanveer, F. (2015). Capital Structure Determination, a Case Study of Sugar Sector of Pakistan Faizan Rashid (Leading Author) University of Gujrat, Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Management Invention ISSN (Online) 2319–8028,:, ISSN (Print): 2319–801X www. ijbmi. org, 4(1), 98-102.

Tchuigoua, H. T. (2014). Institutional framework and capital structure of microfinance institutions. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2185-2197.

Downloads

Published

31.12.2018